引用本文: | 沈 赋,付 玉,徐潇源,等.计及多主体全生命周期碳计量的能量与调频市场运行策略[J].电力系统保护与控制,2025,53(03):27-36.[点击复制] |
SHEN Fu,FU Yu,XU Xiaoyuan,et al.Energy and regulation market operation strategy considering multi-stakeholder full lifecycle carbon accounting[J].Power System Protection and Control,2025,53(03):27-36[点击复制] |
|
摘要: |
全生命周期碳排放计量和碳交易机制充分体现了绿色、协调的发展理念,对于引导市场低碳化建设具有重要意义。面对提升市场经济-环境效益需求,提出了一种考虑多主体全生命周期碳计量的能量与调频市场运行策略。首先,基于全生命周期评价方法,对市场中能源设备主体各环节的碳排放进行量化分析,计算碳排放系数,并构建碳交易成本模型。其次,考虑全生命周期碳排放计量与碳交易机制,以市场各主体申报成本和总碳排放量最小为目标函数,构建能量与调频市场出清模型。最后,采用IEEE 39节点系统进行算例验证,结果表明所建立的模型可以均衡各机组在经济效益和环境效益方面的利益最大化。 |
关键词: 全生命周期碳计量 能量与调频市场 出清模型 碳交易机制 |
DOI:10.19783/j.cnki.pspc.240253 |
投稿时间:2024-03-05修订日期:2024-08-19 |
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目资助(52107097);云南省兴滇英才支持计划项目资助(KKRD202204021);云南省应用基础研究计划项目资助(202101BE070001-061,202201AU070111);昆明理工大学高层次人才平台建设项目资助(KKZ7202004004) |
|
Energy and regulation market operation strategy considering multi-stakeholder full lifecycle carbon accounting |
SHEN Fu1,FU Yu1,XU Xiaoyuan2,WANG Jian1,YANG Guangbing1,ZHANG Wei1,ZHAI Suwei3 |
(1. Faculty of Electric Power Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650500, China;
2. School of Electrical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China;
3. Electric Power Research Institute, Yunnan Power Grid Co., Ltd., Kunming 650217, China) |
Abstract: |
Full life cycle carbon emission accounting and the carbon trading mechanism fully reflect the green and coordinated development concept. This of great significance for guiding the low-carbon construction of the market. In response to the demand for enhancing market economic and environmental benefits, an operational strategy for energy and frequency regulation markets considering multi-stakeholder lifecycle carbon accounting is proposed. First, based on the full lifecycle assessment method, the carbon emissions of each stage of energy equipment in the market are quantitatively analyzed, the carbon emission coefficients are calculated, and a carbon trading cost model is established. Second, considering carbon emission accounting and carbon trading mechanisms throughout the entire lifecycle, with the objective function of minimizing the declared costs and total carbon emissions of each market entity, a clearing model for the energy and regulation market is constructed. Finally, the IEEE 39-bus system is used for case validation, and the results demonstrate that the proposed model effectively balances the maximization of economic and environmental benefits of market participants. |
Key words: full lifecycle carbon accounting energy and regulation market clearing model carbon trading mechanism |